<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave Gadgets lack quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/</link>
	<description>Google Wave Made Easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Google Wave Gadgets Getting Much Better</title>
		<link>http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>New Google Wave Gadgets Getting Much Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masteringwave.com/?p=704#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>[...] If you recall, not very long ago the folks over at Mastering Wave wrote a post titled &#8220;Google Wave Gadgets Lack Quality&#8220;, which questioned the quality of many of the extensions being made. At the time, he was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you recall, not very long ago the folks over at Mastering Wave wrote a post titled &#8220;Google Wave Gadgets Lack Quality&#8220;, which questioned the quality of many of the extensions being made. At the time, he was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masteringwave.com/?p=704#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>Great post! Yeh they do lack quality but i think it will be a slow process and soon when Google launch wave extensions directly and roll out to public .. the quality will improve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Yeh they do lack quality but i think it will be a slow process and soon when Google launch wave extensions directly and roll out to public .. the quality will improve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Uses for Google Wave...Right Now!</title>
		<link>http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Uses for Google Wave...Right Now!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masteringwave.com/?p=704#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>[...] are not very useful and need more developing&#8230;.as Daniel Graverson wrote in his excellent post Google Wave Gadgets Lack Quality. So, for that reason I am not going to talk too much about the extensions that are available to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are not very useful and need more developing&#8230;.as Daniel Graverson wrote in his excellent post Google Wave Gadgets Lack Quality. So, for that reason I am not going to talk too much about the extensions that are available to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masteringwave.com/?p=704#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

Great point. I think many of the extensions that have been built have come out of hack-a-thons. I am a member of the GTUG and see 2-3 extensions every hack-a-thon. Thus, you get an unfinished product. The ones that are being built by developers are, I think, just place holder extensions while they wait for something more from Google.

I think this year in the second half will be an exciting time for Google Wave as we should have a more stable and updated release. Also, we should get something ref direction at I/O 2010.

Are you going to I/O 2010? I have my ticket, I will be there. Would be nice to get together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>Great point. I think many of the extensions that have been built have come out of hack-a-thons. I am a member of the GTUG and see 2-3 extensions every hack-a-thon. Thus, you get an unfinished product. The ones that are being built by developers are, I think, just place holder extensions while they wait for something more from Google.</p>
<p>I think this year in the second half will be an exciting time for Google Wave as we should have a more stable and updated release. Also, we should get something ref direction at I/O 2010.</p>
<p>Are you going to I/O 2010? I have my ticket, I will be there. Would be nice to get together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.masteringwave.com/2010/01/wave-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masteringwave.com/?p=704#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve definitely felt this as well. I think you make a good point too about how for some of these apps you have to be a real tech savvy user and jump through a bunch of hoops to use a gadget. I realize by default Google Wave tends to appeal to the more tech savvy user, but if Google Wave is to be used as a helpful tool for any type of user, the ease of using a app needs to be upped a bit. 

I&#039;d almost like to see a favorites list within wave for gadgets remembering their URLs and all that.. that way you can add it in just a click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve definitely felt this as well. I think you make a good point too about how for some of these apps you have to be a real tech savvy user and jump through a bunch of hoops to use a gadget. I realize by default Google Wave tends to appeal to the more tech savvy user, but if Google Wave is to be used as a helpful tool for any type of user, the ease of using a app needs to be upped a bit. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d almost like to see a favorites list within wave for gadgets remembering their URLs and all that.. that way you can add it in just a click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

